Hilton or Marriott?
By: Tom Mercer on 12 21, 2007
The question at hand is: if I’m an environmentally conscious traveler, should I stay at a Hilton or a Marriott? Just to remind you that the idea here is that as a traveler, you wield an considerable amount of power with your wallet, so how should you use that power if you want to choose based on environmental issues?
(Before I get into the meat of this post, let me offer a disclaimer. I cannot possibly know all of the environmental initiatives and programs going on at each hotel. I also cannot measure what the hotels’ baselines are in terms of energy use, water use, pollution, etc. I cannot tell you whether one hotel has followed through on their environmental initiatives and the other hasn’t. I wish all that data were available at my fingertips, but it’s not. Until we have a lodging certification system that allows for consistent audits across all properties, we’ll never be able to measure hotels accurately against one another.
Well, you might ask: what do you know? What I know is what Hilton and Marriott have published on their website–their public commitments to environmental values and programs. I have to take them at their word that they are executing these programs, and I have to assume that we, the public, will hold them accountable. I would suggest that if you stay in a Marriott or a Hilton, ask about these programs and what the location you’re staying in has done with regard to them.
And please check out Hilton and Marriott’s webpages on environmental programs and stewardship on your own. See if you agree with my judgment.
Hilton
So, what is Hilton doing? Here is a boiled-down list of their main environmental initiatives.
- Nearly every Hilton hotel (including Hilton, Hilton Garden, DoubleTree, Hampton Inn, and Homewood Suites) participates in the “Green Program”–which means that guests are given the option of reusing towels. Apparently, this program saves 12 million gallons of fresh water annually.
- Hilton says that it implemented a “corporate-wide” initiative to retrofit rooms with CFL lightbulbs - reducing room wattage from 750 to 220 Watts. It’s unclear, though, how many rooms have been retrofitted, though, and from the numbers, it’s obvious that it does not incorporate every hotel–or even nearly that number.
- Hilton seems to have explored how an individual hotel’s recycling program could work and printed their findings in corporate manuals, but there is no mandate for any hotel manager to implement this program. Also, they are currently EXAMINING in-room recycling options (no action yet on the corporate level).
- The hotel chain has instituted HER (Hilton Environmental Reporting) system, which seems to be a piece of software that allows managers to benchmark their environmental performance and report to corporate. This system was instituted in 2004 and none of the information has been made public in any comprehensive way.
- In the UK and Ireland, Hilton Hotels get 100% of their electricity from renewable sources.
- In the UK and Ireland, Hilton initiated a 15,000-person strong task force to tackle environmental issues, which they say led to 780 specific actions. Unfortunately, none of these actions are named.
- In September 2003, 400 Hilton hotels across the world participated in Environmental Action Month, where each of the local branches did something to ameliorate its environmental impact, and they published examples on their website.
- In November, Hilton Garden Hotels (a subset of Hiltons) announced that they would be phasing out use of styrofoam cups in favor of paper and corn based “ecotainers.” They’re compostable, which begs the question: has Hilton instituted a composting program?
- Way back in the late 1990s, Hilton conducted an energy reduction program in 14 of their European hotels and since then “several more hotels were given the go-ahead for audit and improvement programmes.”
Bottom Line: In North America, Hilton’s main approach has been to allow individual properties and managers to take action on environmental issues if they so choose. It’s nice that they reuse linens and save freshwater, but there’s a lot more that can be done. The UK and Europe seem to be taking more action, but on the whole, count me unimpressed.
Marriott
What is Marriott doing about the environment? We saw earlier in the week that they have a high opinion of their efforts thus far, while also acknowledging there is a lot left to do:
- They have a BUZZWORD! ECHO (Environmentally Conscious Hospitality Operators) is the name they’ve given to their green initiatives.
- Headquarters Initiatives: they’ve replaced plastic utensils with spudware, given premium parking spaces to hybrid drivers, and made reusable mugs available. This feels pretty week.
- Their energy- and water-efficient laundry facility in Washington D.C. serves six locations and saves 3.5 million gallons of water annually just on its own! (Compared to 12 million gallons for Hilton’s whole towel reuse program.)
- They’re building the first LEED-certified hotel in Baltimore, a Fairfield Inn that will open in 2009. They built the chain’s first LEED-certified hotel in Adelphi, Maryland.
- The company has led a whole smorgasbord of energy- and resource-saving initiatives, including: replacing 4,500 outdoor signs with LED displays, replacing 450,000 light-bulbs with CFLs in 2006, saving 11-17 percent on their water usage through linen reuse programs, and installing 400,000 low-flow shower heads (which each save 10% on hot water use per year)
- 96% of Marriott’s hotels recycle in some form. Of course, there’s no quantification here, but it’s an area they say they’re working on. We’ll see.
- Most impressively, Marriott is a member of the EPA’s Climate Leaders program, and they’ve committed to reducing their energy use 6% per guest room in the period from 2005 to 2010. This is a modest but quantifiable step toward reducing energy use.
- Marriott has received more EnergySTAR labels than any other company (160) and for this, won the EPA’s 2007 Energy Star “Sustained Excellence” award.
Bottom Line: Many of Marriott’s environmental initiatives also rely on the actions of local property managers. However, Marriott has created incentive systems to award and highlight managers for their environmental iniatives. And on a corporate level, they are taking MEASURABLE steps toward reducing their energy and water use. Next step: waste reduction. We’ll see how they do there.
The winnner is… MARRIOTT
The result here isn’t in doubt. If you want to make the Hilton/Marriott decision based on environmental factors, choose Marriott. Based on the information available, there is no doubt in my mind that Marriott has more active and committed programs to reduce their environmental impact. They’ve also worked to earn many more EPA endorsements for their efforts than Hilton. To be frank, though, I’d like to see both of these chains take a more integrated approach to their environmental impact.
Have you had an experience at a Marriott or Hilton that you’d like to share? Please comment or send us an e-mail at simplegreenchoices@gmail.com.






















9 Responses
This is interesting, because it taps some important ‘macro’ issues relating to environmentalism: On the one hand, individual commitment to “green” efforts is key; but in the case of organizational functioning, the “top-down” approach clearly has the biggest impact, as evidenced by your reporting on Marriott vs. Hilton. Perhaps there’s a political lesson to be learned: Policies from the “corporate office” (analogous to the government) have enormous impact on local business operations (analogous to individual citizens). I hope the administration takes note . . . .
Thomas, this is a very astute point. While I’m not sure how far the analogy between the government and a corporation goes, there is no doubt that word about environmental initiatves are more effective when they come from “corporate.” That is not to say that all of the IDEAS have to come from the top. For example, awarding real prizes or recognition to individual hotel managers who introduce the most effectivae and game-changing environmental programs at their individual hotels would likely be very effective. And it seems like Marriott is doing a bit of that, although they could be doing more.
[…] tried to get beyond the marketing messages and get a better idea of concrete actions that both Hilton and Marriott have taken. We declared Marriott the […]
Does anybody know about this site ( www.earthlab.com ) ? I have seen other environmental sites with carbon calculators like yahoo and tree huggers, but I am wondering what the deal with earthlab.com is, is it credible? I saw they also published a list last month of the top ten greenest cities ( http://www.efficientenergy.org/Top-Ten-Green-Cities-in-the-United-States ). Does anyone know if this site is better than say WWF site? Fill me in
I took their carbon foot print test and it was pretty interesting, but they said that I put out 4.5 tons of carbon while another test gave me like 15 tons? I think I trust earthlab.com’s test a little more (because my score is lower). Does anyone know about any other tests?
[…] programs at Marriott hotels, when compared to Hilton, have lead to more efficient hotels that are better for the environment. Marriott has created […]
I have always liked staying at the Marriott, now I have one more reason to book a room with them. Thanks for the insightful post. I have a new perspective on hotels and what to consider when I book besides rates and availability.
Reference ecotainers and the movement by marriot from styrofoam cups, although the Ecotainer is compostable, it is has a lot else going for it, it is from a 100% renewable resource, so no oil based plastic liner. The ideal situation would be to get savacup to collect cups after use, and they would get them sent for pulping. Ecotainers could be slightly more environmentally friendlier than standard paper cups, and also has all certification to prove it is food safe, and compostable.
There are many options when looking at being environmentally friendly, at one end of the scale we could go to the stream, cup our hands and drink the water, at the other a china mug, used once and thrown away, each person / business has to find a point along the path that fits there needs and wants.
Check out this website which details a lot more about Hilton’s environmental efforts that will really make you reconsider your choice of luxury hotel!
I personally would always choose the Hilton. as a contractor with 25 years on the job, ive worked in both chains’ hotels all over the east coast and i can say this :
I always enter these hotels through the freight/service areas.
Hilton report: Clean always, smells clean and fresh all the time, never saw a roach
MARRIOT: FILTHY SERVICE AREA, FULL OF ROACHES SCURRYING ABOUT EVERY TIME I VISITED, ALWAYS SMELLED LIKE SHIT
Considering all food/towels/linens/etc. enter this way, HILTON ALL THE WAY